NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and AMD Radeon RX Vega XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1459.6x more texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s
- Around 69% higher pipelines: 6912 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 10x more maximum memory size: 80 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204643 vs 196748
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Nov 2020 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6912 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 80 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204643 vs 196748 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1630 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1630 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204643 | 196748 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA100 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 16 Nov 2020 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 33 | 34 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1630 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6912 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | 417.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,353 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 80 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2039 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2e | HBM2 |