NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1316 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68128 vs 44706
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 21 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1316 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 vs 44706 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 | 44706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 299 | 296 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | 111.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 279.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7200 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 230.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |