NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP
- 920x more texture fill rate: 920 MTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 920 MTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 250 MHz vs 230 MHz
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 332 MHz vs 132 MHz
Core clock speed | 250 MHz vs 230 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 332 MHz vs 132 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Celsius |
Code name | NV18 C1 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 14 December 2003 | 14 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1205 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 230 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 920 MTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 29 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.0 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.056 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 132 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR |