NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M and ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 110 nm
Launch date | 1 February 2006 vs 8 November 2004 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 110 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 30 vs 13
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 30 vs 13 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M | ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 188 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13 | 30 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M + nForce 610M | ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 9 |
Code name | MCP67M | RS480 |
Launch date | 1 February 2006 | 8 November 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 934 | 935 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 110 nm |
Transistor count | 112 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |