NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 102 vs 61
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 January 2008 vs 29 October 2007 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 102 vs 61 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 19.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 482 vs 25
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 482 vs 25 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 102 | 61 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25 | 482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 610i | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Tesla |
Code name | C73 | G92 |
Launch date | 13 January 2008 | 29 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1355 | 1356 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Transistor count | 112 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |