NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920A and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 7.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 23 November 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 10.1x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- 6.7x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 846
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 168
- 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27106 vs 3693
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27106 vs 3693 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920A | AMD Radeon R9 M295X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 846 | 5150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3693 | 27106 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920A | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK208B | Amethyst |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 23 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1143 | 488 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |