NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 530 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 278 vs 169
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3297 vs 1016
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3297 vs 1016
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 vs 169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 vs 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 vs 1016 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 | 278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 38 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1016 | 3297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1016 | 3297 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G86 | G94 |
| Launch date | 1 August 2008 | 29 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1460 | 1461 |
| Price now | $79.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 530 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 billion / sec | 12.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 505 million |
| Gigaflops | 180 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
