NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 376
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 88 vs 87
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 3076
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 3076
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 vs 376 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 vs 87 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 3076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 3076 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 | 88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | 3315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G92 |
Launch date | 21 August 2008 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1331 | 1297 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
Price now | $925 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 352.0 gflops |
Gigaflops | 240 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 35.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |