NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 140 nm vs 150 nm
Manufacturing process technology | 140 nm vs 150 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 1.3 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 325 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 650 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rankine | Rankine |
Code name | NV34 B1 | NV34 A2 |
Launch date | 6 March 2003 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 325 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 140 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 45 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP Pro 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 171 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR |