NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rankine | Rankine |
Code name | NV34 A2 | NV30 |
Launch date | 6 March 2003 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 325 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 130 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 45 million | 125 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP Pro 8x | AGP 8x |
Length | 171 mm | 213 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR |