NVIDIA GeForce G205M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G205M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G205M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 13x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 182 Watt
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 294 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 16 June 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 294 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 13.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1208 vs 92
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 989
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 989
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 vs 92 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 989 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G205M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 294 | 53 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 92 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 989 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 989 | 3342 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G205M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | MCP79MX | GT200 |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1048 | 1396 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Price now | $95.38 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 182 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |