NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 384 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 102
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 vs 28 April 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 384 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 vs 102 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 12 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 264 gflops vs 120 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2160 vs 1962
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2160 vs 1962
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 vs 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 vs 1962 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 | 102 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1962 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1962 | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94B | G92 |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 | 28 April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1387 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | 264 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 26.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 384 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 24 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |