NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 122 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 9.6x more texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 9.424 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1536 vs 96
- 8.1x better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 269.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 9.424 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops vs 269.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3992 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF119 | GK104 |
Launch date | 20 August 2012 | 17 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 706 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,950 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 269.2 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 9.424 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |