NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 783 MHz vs 525 MHz
  • 11.9x more texture fill rate: 25.06 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
  • 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
  • 14.3x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 42 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
  • 4.5x more memory clock speed: 3608 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 24.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3313 vs 136
  • 24.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3313 vs 136
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 March 2011 vs 1 January 2007
Core clock speed 783 MHz vs 525 MHz
Texture fill rate 25.06 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 40
Floating-point performance 601.3 gflops vs 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 3608 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3313 vs 136
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3313 vs 136

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

  • 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 106 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 106 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3313
136
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3313
136
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.611
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 422.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.255
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 49.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2166
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3313 136
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2166
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3313 136
PassMark - G2D Mark 262
PassMark - G3D Mark 77

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 TeraScale
Code name GF116 RV610
Launch date 15 March 2011 1 January 2007
Place in performance rating 1188 1190
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 783 MHz 525 MHz
Floating-point performance 601.3 gflops 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 192 40
Texture fill rate 25.06 GTexel / s 2.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 106 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 1,170 million 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 210 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 57.7 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 3608 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR2