NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1006 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 364.8x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 195 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3666
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3306
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3666
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1006 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 195 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5545 vs 2804
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 241
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18431 vs 12521
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 4655
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 4655
- Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1990 vs 1247
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5545 vs 2804 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 533 vs 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18431 vs 12521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 vs 4655 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1990 vs 1247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2804 | 5545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 533 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12521 | 18431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 1990 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 553 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $579.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2048 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
