NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
| Launch date | May 2022 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 10 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
| Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5784 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38658 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.0 |
| Code name | GA107 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | May 2022 | 2 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 323 | 1056 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | 352.0 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 2.816 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | 1408 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | 22.00 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 88.00 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | unknown | |
| Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |

