NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 420x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42590 vs 37915
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2022 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42590 vs 37915 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 385
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13808 vs 6179
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 832 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 385 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13808 vs 6179 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 853 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6179 | 13808 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42590 | 37915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GA107 | GM200 |
| Launch date | May 2022 | 2 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 299 | 296 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 250 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX570A with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
AMDFireStream 9250
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
