NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5950 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5950 and ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5950
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 950 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5950 | ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rankine | Rage 7 |
Code name | NV38 A1 | RV280 |
Launch date | 17 February 2004 | 26 January 2004 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.9 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 Watt | |
Transistor count | 135 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0a | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 30.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |