NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13605 vs 7514
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 93962 vs 41822
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 11616
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 4909
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 11616
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 4909
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13605 vs 7514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 vs 41822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 4909 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 652 vs 570
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3355
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 vs 570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13605 | 7514 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 652 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 | 41822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 18294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 18294 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU104B | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 125 | 193 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VR Ready | ||
