NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13787 vs 7798
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 41822
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 11616
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 4909
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 11616
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 4909
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13787 vs 7798 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 vs 41822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 4909 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 582
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3355
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13787 | 7798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 582 | 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | 41822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 18294 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8549 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU104B | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 137 | 162 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |