NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13799 vs 10201
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 583 vs 487
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 16828
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 16828
- Around 54% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8562 vs 5572
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13799 vs 10201 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 583 vs 487 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 16828 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 vs 5572 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 8912
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3355
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 8912
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13799 | 10201 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 583 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8054 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 | 5572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 136 | 117 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
