NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 546.2x more texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 65368
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 10966
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3686
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 10966
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3686
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 6 April 2017
Texture fill rate 207.4 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 82601 vs 65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344 vs 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344 vs 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

  • Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 8.3x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 13796
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 582
  • Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10148 vs 8579
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1405 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 3072
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 11408 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 17881 vs 13796
PassMark - G2D Mark 934 vs 582
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10148 vs 8579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13796
17881
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
582
934
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
82601
65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20344
10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20344
10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
8579
10148
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark 13796 17881
PassMark - G2D Mark 582 934
Geekbench - OpenCL 82601 65368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8579 10148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 256.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2513.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 19.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 43.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1139.382

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU104B GP102
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 6 April 2017
Place in performance rating 136 212
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $1,199
Price now $1,200
Value for money (0-100) 15.97

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1582 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1405 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3840
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 207.4 GTexel/s 379.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 12,150 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s 547.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 11408 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5X