NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 469.7x more texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20718 vs 11451
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3198
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20718 vs 11451
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20718 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20718 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1246 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154349 vs 86892
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154349 vs 86892 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13832 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 604 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86892 | 154349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20718 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20718 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3198 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104B | GV100 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 59 | 146 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1246 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7130
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
