NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 15652
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 705
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 vs 105171
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 270.203
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 3728.248
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 26.999
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 174.185 vs 110.761
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1370.281
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 19811
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 19811
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 vs 15652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 vs 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 vs 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 270.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 3728.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 vs 26.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 vs 110.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1370.281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 19811 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 3537
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 3537 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 | 15652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 270.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 3728.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | 26.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | 110.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 1370.281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $2,299 |
Place in performance rating | 91 | 138 |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |