NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2535 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 18 May 2023 vs 16 Nov 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s
- Around 59% higher pipelines: 6912 vs 4352
- 5x more maximum memory size: 80 GB vs 16 GB
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6912 vs 4352 |
Maximum memory size | 80 GB vs 16 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1067 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22854 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13485 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD106 | GA100 |
Launch date | 18 May 2023 | 16 Nov 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 30 | 28 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 4352 | 6912 |
Pixel fill rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 225.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 609.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 22900 million | 54200 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 240 mm, 9.4 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 800 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 80 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 2039 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 5120 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) |