NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP and NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s
Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP | NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Celsius |
Code name | NV11 B3 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 3 March 2001 | 3 March 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 180 nm |
Texture fill rate | 700 MTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 20 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.328 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 166 MHz | 166 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |