NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 and NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s
Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 | NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Celsius |
Code name | NV11 B2 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 3 March 2001 | 3 March 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 180 nm |
Texture fill rate | 700 MTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 20 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.328 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 166 MHz | 166 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |