NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 vs NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 and NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 125 MHz
  • 3.2x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 180 nm vs 250 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 32 MB vs 16 MB
  • Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 166 MHz vs 143 MHz
Launch date 3 March 2001 vs 12 October 1999
Core clock speed 200 MHz vs 125 MHz
Texture fill rate 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 180 nm vs 250 nm
Maximum memory size 32 MB vs 16 MB
Memory clock speed 166 MHz vs 143 MHz

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64

Essentials

Architecture Celsius Fahrenheit
Code name NV11 B2 NV5 B6
Launch date 3 March 2001 12 October 1999
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 200 MHz 125 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 180 nm 250 nm
Texture fill rate 800 MTexel / s 250.0 MTexel / s
Transistor count 20 million 15 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x VGA 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface AGP 4x AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 7.0 6.0
OpenGL 1.2 1.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 MB
Memory bandwidth 2.656 GB / s 1.144 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 166 MHz 143 MHz
Memory type SDR SDR