NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 vs NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 and NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 125 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 180 nm vs 250 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 MB vs 16 MB
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 166 MHz vs 143 MHz
Launch date | 3 March 2001 vs 12 October 1999 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 125 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm vs 250 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 MB vs 16 MB |
Memory clock speed | 166 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 | NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Fahrenheit |
Code name | NV11 B2 | NV5 B6 |
Launch date | 3 March 2001 | 12 October 1999 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 125 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 250 nm |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s | 250.0 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 20 million | 15 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 7.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 16 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | 1.144 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 166 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |