NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 250 MHz vs 160 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 250 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
Core clock speed | 250 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 250 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm vs 180 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 101 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Celsius | Rage 7 |
Code name | NV17 A5 | RS320 |
Launch date | 14 October 2002 | 5 October 2002 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1362 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 160 MHz |
Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 2 | |
Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 29 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 250 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | 32 | |
Shared memory | yes |