NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1095 MHz vs 480 MHz
- 33569.6x more texture fill rate: 800.3 GTexel/s vs 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 912x more pipelines: 14592 vs 2x 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 65 nm
- 160x more maximum memory size: 80 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz
Launch date | 22 Mar 2022 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1095 MHz vs 480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 800.3 GTexel/s vs 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 14592 vs 2x 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 80 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Name | NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 281515 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 67 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA H100 PCIe 80 GB | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Hopper | Tesla |
Code name | GH100 | G98 |
Launch date | 22 Mar 2022 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3 | 1442 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $163.14 | |
Price now | $168 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 480 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 14592 | 2x 8 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 800.3 GTexel/s | 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 80000 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 19.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 268 mm, 10.6 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 80 GB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR3 |