NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs AMD Radeon RX 470D
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and AMD Radeon RX 470D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1552 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 1052.6x more texture fill rate: 142.2 GTexel/s vs 135.1 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 21 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s vs 135.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470D
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470D
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | AMD Radeon RX 470D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | AMD Radeon RX 470D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 21 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz | 926 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 142.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.86 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s | 135.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,322 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 211.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |