NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1552 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 60356.5x more texture fill rate: 142.2 GTexel/s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
- 320x more pipelines: 2560 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 309
- 100x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12598 vs 126
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 26 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s vs 2.356 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 vs 309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 vs 126 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | 309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 | 126 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GA106 | GT218 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 26 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 555 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz | 589 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 142.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 8 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.86 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s | 2.356 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 260 million |
Floating-point performance | 22.432 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 168 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |