NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1552 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 142.2 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 480
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12598 vs 7753
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 vs 480 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 vs 7753 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | 480 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12598 | 7753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA106 | GA107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 17 Dec 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 348 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1245 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1552 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 142.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.098 TFLOPS | 5.100 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.86 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 142.2 GTexel/s | 79.68 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 229 mm, 9 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 113 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |