NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB and AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
- 13.1x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 15.20 GTexel/s
- 28x more pipelines: 3584 vs 128
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 15.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 128 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1900 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1577 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15295 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Mendocino |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 20 Sep 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 82 | 1643 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 6 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 128 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 7.600 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 15.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 486.4 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB/s | System Dependent |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz, 15 Gbps effective | System Shared |
Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |