NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 70305.6x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 60.8x more pipelines: 4864 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 19 Oct 2022 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 80 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2795 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
Code name | GA104 | M92 |
Launch date | 19 Oct 2022 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 460 | 459 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 80 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 242 million |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |