NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 181.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 380
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 7539
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 41907
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 vs 7539 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 vs 41907 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 2255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 vs 2255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 7539 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 41907 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 3656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 123 | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
