NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- 2.6x more pipelines: 7680 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 908
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 18750
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 1752
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 105219
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 326.494
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 31.684
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 159.275
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 1506.874
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 908 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 18750 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 vs 1752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 1506.874 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 285 Watt
- 10.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 908 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 18750 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | 1752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | 1506.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 8 | 105 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7680 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |