NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 96% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 1889.6x more texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 7680 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 611
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 11814
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 78188
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 20 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 611 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 11814 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 78188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1430 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1430 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 611 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 11814 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 78188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD104 | GP100 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 8 | 176 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7680 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |