NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 276.0 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 3072
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 3072 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 548
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17596 vs 10916
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 548 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17596 vs 10916 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 732 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10916 | 17596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89017 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | GA104 | AD107 |
Launch date | 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 110 | 116 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 552.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5888 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 120.0 GPixel/s | 60.48 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s | 181.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Form factor | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |