NVIDIA P104-100 vs AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3628 vs 2892
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 17 December 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3628 vs 2892 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 120
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 vs 120 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 559 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3628 | 2892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 17 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 565 | 563 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |