NVIDIA P104-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and AMD Radeon R9 M385X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51497 vs 49760
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3576 vs 1994
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 vs 49760 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3576 vs 1994 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 121
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 vs 121 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R9 M385X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 | 49760 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 121 | 267 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3576 | 1994 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Strato |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 569 | 572 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |