NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 16.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1010 MHz
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2060 vs 242
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 394
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 July 2010 vs 20 April 2006 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1010 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 vs 242 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 394 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 405 MHz
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 96 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 405 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 96 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 | 242 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 394 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23008 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5249 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5249 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7205 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
| Code name | GF100 | G71 |
| Launch date | 27 July 2010 | 20 April 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 429 | 430 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,840.60 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 32.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1010 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
