NVIDIA Quadro DCC vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro DCC and NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro DCC
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 MB vs 32 MB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 230 MHz vs 166 MHz
Launch date | 14 May 2001 vs 3 March 2001 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 700 MTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 MB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 230 MHz vs 166 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro DCC | NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kelvin | Celsius |
Code name | NV20 A5 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 14 May 2001 | 3 March 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 180 nm |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s | 700 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 57 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 3.68 GB / s | 1.328 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 230 MHz | 166 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |