NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G vs ATI All-In-Wonder X600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G and ATI All-In-Wonder X600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 4.5 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 4.5 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X600
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 375 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 110 nm vs 130 nm
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 375 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm vs 130 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G | ATI All-In-Wonder X600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Curie | Rage 9 |
| Code name | NV45 | RV370 |
| Launch date | 28 July 2005 | 1 July 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 375 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 110 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 4.5 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 83 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 222 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 33.6 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
