NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G vs ATI All-In-Wonder X600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G and ATI All-In-Wonder X600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 4.5 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate | 4.5 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X600
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 375 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 110 nm vs 130 nm
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm vs 130 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400G | ATI All-In-Wonder X600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 9 |
Code name | NV45 | RV370 |
Launch date | 28 July 2005 | 1 July 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 375 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 110 nm |
Texture fill rate | 4.5 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 83 Watt | |
Transistor count | 222 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 33.6 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |