NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 19.2x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 128 MB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 105x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 525 vs 5
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 March 2007 vs 14 December 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 332 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 525 vs 5 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 109
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 109 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 525 | 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 | 131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Celsius |
| Code name | G80 | NV18 A4 |
| Launch date | 5 March 2007 | 14 December 2003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1243 | 1245 |
| Price now | $179.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 171 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 681 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 254 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 332 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
