NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 2x 5,120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 580 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2x 8 GB
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 3 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops vs 2x 5,120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 580 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2x 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1696 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 848 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 143963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GV100 | Grenada |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 3 September 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | $1,399 |
| Place in performance rating | 93 | 262 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1132 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | 2x 5,120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2x 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 580 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21,100 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2x 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |