NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1430 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 37.37 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,196 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 13 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1430 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37.37 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,196 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.218 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.149 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.677 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP107 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 13 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1454 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $174.95 | |
| Price now | $99.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.91 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1430 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,196 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.37 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |