NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1430 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,196 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1430 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,196 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 37.37 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 37.37 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 825 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1363 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1430 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,196 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.37 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |