NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
- 13.4x more texture fill rate: 4x 51.8 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 8.6x more pipelines: 4x 240 vs 112
- 7.4x better floating-point performance: 4x 622.1 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate | 4x 51.8 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4x 240 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 622.1 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 648 MHz
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 600 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 648 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 600 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Name | NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 60 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G92 |
Launch date | 25 July 2008 | 21 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1077 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 648 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 622.1 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 240 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 51.8 GTexel / s billion / sec | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 600 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 522 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 102.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |