NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
| Launch date | 12 November 2002 vs 5 October 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 160 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm vs 180 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 101 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro4 580 XGL | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Celsius | Rage 7 |
| Code name | NV18 A4 | RS320 |
| Launch date | 12 November 2002 | 5 October 2002 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1400 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 160 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 180 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.2 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 29 million | 30 million |
| Boost clock speed | 160 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR | |
| Shared memory | yes | |