NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA CMP 40HX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2025 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 40HX
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 237.6 GTexel/s vs 129.6 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 95902 vs 58770
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 237.6 GTexel/s vs 129.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 95902 vs 58770 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA CMP 40HX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation | NVIDIA CMP 40HX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11000 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 58770 | 95902 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation | NVIDIA CMP 40HX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD107 | TU106 |
Place in performance rating | 170 | 173 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2025 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.80 GPixel/s | 105.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 237.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 18900 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |